The cell line is not validated yet.
BIHi045-A
General
Cell Line |
|
| hPSCreg name | BIHi045-A |
| Cite as: | BIHi045-A |
| Cell line type | Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) |
| Similar lines | No similar lines found. |
| Last update | 14th February 2025 |
| User feedback | |
Provider |
|
| Generator | Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) |
General Information |
|
| * Is the cell line readily obtainable for third parties? |
Yes Research use: allowed
Clinical use: not allowed
Commercial use: not allowed
|
| Subclones | |
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | male |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | A disease was diagnosed.
|
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | No |
| Please provide contact information of the holder of the original Donor Information Sheet. | peter.kühnen@charite.de |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | Yes |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | pseudonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | Controlled Access |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | Ethikkommission der Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin |
| Approval number | EA2/013/16 |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type | |
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | RNA |
| Genes | |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
PCR
|
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
No |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method |
Enzyme-free cell dissociation
EDTA
|
| Medium |
Essential 8™
|
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | Yes |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | Flow Cytometry | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| NANOG |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| POU5F1 (OCT-4) |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| SSEA-4 |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| TRA 1-60 |
Yes |
|
|
Score:
| Marker | Present | Absent |
| mCpG | ||
| OCT4 |
| Pluripotency Score | Novelty Score | |
| 27.14 | 1.83 |
Differentiation Potency
Microbiology / Virus Screening |
|
| HIV 1 | Negative |
| HIV 2 | Negative |
| Hepatitis B | Negative |
| Hepatitis C | Negative |
| Mycoplasma | Negative |
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
46, XY
Karyotyping method:
G-Banding
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.