iFCI006, NH13-0078
CRICKi008-A
General
Cell Line |
|
| hPSCreg name | CRICKi008-A |
| Cite as: | CRICKi008-A (RRID:CVCL_C5T0) |
| Alternative name(s) |
iFCI006, NH13-0078
|
| Cell line type | Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) |
| Similar lines | No similar lines found. |
| Last update | 2nd November 2024 |
| User feedback | |
Provider |
|
| Generator | The Francis Crick Institute Limited (CRICK) |
| Owner | The Francis Crick Institute Limited (CRICK) |
| Distributors | |
| Derivation country | United Kingdom |
External Databases |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA112229690 |
| Cellosaurus | CVCL_C5T0 |
| Wikidata | Q116048791 |
General Information |
|
| Publications | |
| * Is the cell line readily obtainable for third parties? |
Yes Research use: allowed
Clinical use: not allowed
Commercial use: not allowed
Additional restrictions:
the cell line can be obtained by third parties using appropriate MTA |
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | male |
| Ethnicity | 6 months old |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | A disease was diagnosed.
|
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA112229691 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | Yes |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | No |
| If you do not hold the Donor Consent Form, do you know who does? | Yes |
| Please provide the contact information | https://www.ucl.ac.uk/child-health/mrc-cnmd-biobank-london |
| Confirm that consent was obtained by a qualified professional | Yes |
| Has the donor agreed to be re-contacted? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed about how her/his data will be protected? | Yes |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | anonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
| Does consent pertain to a specific research project? | No |
| Does the consent permit uses of donated embryo/tissue or derived cell line intended for clinical treatment or human applications? | No |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
Does consent permit research by | |
| an academic institution? | Yes |
| a public organisation? | Yes |
| a non-profit company? | Yes |
| a for-profit corporation? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | No information |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | The London – West London & GTAC Research Ethics Committee (formerly known as the Hammersmith, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Research Ethics Committee). |
| Approval number | 08ND17 |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? | |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type |
Synonyms
|
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | None |
Vector free reprogramming |
|
| Type of used vector free reprogramming factor(s) |
mRNA
|
| mRNA | |
Other |
|
| Selection criteria for clones | COLONIES MANUALLY PICKED (BEST MORPHOLOGY) |
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
No |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method |
Enzyme-free cell dissociation
Gentle Cell Dissociation Reagent
|
| O2 Concentration | 5 % |
| CO2 Concentration | 5 % |
| Medium |
mTeSR™ 1
|
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
Morphology pictures
Method documentation
i078B_FINAL FLOW FIGURE.png
Flow cytometry showed markers for OCT4 and SSEA-4 were detected, while SSEA-1 was not detected.
Differentiation Potency
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
In vitro directed differentiation
Scorecard
| Marker | Expressed |
| GATA4 |
Yes |
Morphology
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
In vitro directed differentiation
Scorecard
| Marker | Expressed |
| AFP |
Yes |
Morphology
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
In vitro directed differentiation
Scorecard
| Marker | Expressed |
| BETA TUBULIN |
Yes |
Morphology
Microbiology / Virus Screening |
|
| Mycoplasma | Negative |
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.