iFCI012, iFCI012 CLONE 4
CRICKi009-A
General
Cell Line |
|
| hPSCreg name | CRICKi009-A |
| Cite as: | CRICKi009-A (RRID:CVCL_C5T1) |
| Alternative name(s) |
iFCI012, iFCI012 CLONE 4
|
| Cell line type | Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) |
| Similar lines |
|
| Last update | 2nd November 2024 |
| User feedback | |
Provider |
|
| Generator | The Francis Crick Institute Limited (CRICK) |
| Owner | The Francis Crick Institute Limited (CRICK) |
| Distributors | |
| Derivation country | United Kingdom |
External Databases |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA112239881 |
| Cellosaurus | CVCL_C5T1 |
| Wikidata | Q116048792 |
General Information |
|
| Publications | |
| * Is the cell line readily obtainable for third parties? |
Yes Research use: allowed
Clinical use: not allowed
Commercial use: not allowed
Additional restrictions:
the cell line can be obtained by third parties using appropriate MTA |
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | male |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | A disease was diagnosed.
|
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
Unknown
|
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA112239882 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | Yes |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | No |
| If you do not hold the Donor Consent Form, do you know who does? | Yes |
| Please provide the contact information | https://www.royalmarsden.nhs.uk |
| Confirm that consent was obtained by a qualified professional | Yes |
| Has the donor agreed to be re-contacted? | Unknown |
| Has the donor been informed about how her/his data will be protected? | Yes |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | pseudonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
| Does consent pertain to a specific research project? | Yes |
| Details on restriction to research project | TRACERx Renal CAPTURE Sub-study (TRACERxRenal) |
| Does consent permit unforeseen future research, without further consent? | Yes |
| Does the consent permit uses of donated embryo/tissue or derived cell line intended for clinical treatment or human applications? | No |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
Does consent permit research by | |
| an academic institution? | Yes |
| a public organisation? | Yes |
| a non-profit company? | Yes |
| a for-profit corporation? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | No information |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust |
| Approval number | IRAS Project ID: 80475 |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? | |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type |
A peripheral blood cell with a single nucleus. This category includes lymphocytes and monocytes.
Synonyms
|
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Sendai virus |
| Genes | |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
RT-PCR
|
| Files and images showing reprogramming vector expressed or silenced | |
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Selection criteria for clones | The clones showing iPSC morphology were manually picked |
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
No |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method |
Enzyme-free cell dissociation
Gentle Cell Dissociation Reagent
|
| O2 Concentration | 5 % |
| CO2 Concentration | 5 % |
| Medium |
mTeSR™ 1
|
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
Flow cytometry showed markers for OCT4 and SSEA-4 were detected, while SSEA-1 was not detected.
Method documentation
iFCI012 FLOW FIGURE.png
Flow cytometry showed markers for OCT4 and SSEA-4 were detected, while SSEA-1 was not detected.
Differentiation Potency
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
In vitro directed differentiation
Scorecard
Morphology
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
In vitro directed differentiation
Scorecard
Morphology
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
In vitro directed differentiation
Scorecard
Morphology
Microbiology / Virus Screening |
|
| Mycoplasma | Negative |
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.