FC17
CSSi015-A
General
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | male |
| Age of donor (at collection) | 5-9 |
| Ethnicity | Caucasian |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | No disease was diagnosed.
|
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
Karyotyping method:
G-Banding
|
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA110061804 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | Yes |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | No |
| If you do not hold the Donor Consent Form, do you know who does? | Yes |
| Please provide the contact information | Dott.ssa Caputi, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | pseudonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
| Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | No information |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | |
| Approval number | |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type | |
| Source cell origin |
The portion of the upper extremity between the shoulder and the elbow. For clinical purposes this term is also used to refer to the whole superior limb.
Synonyms
|
| Age of donor (at collection) | 5-9 |
| Collected in | 2017 |
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Episomal |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
Yes |
| Methods used |
RT-PCR
|
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Selection criteria for clones | morphology, marker expression, teratoma formation |
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
Yes |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method | Mechanically |
| Medium |
Other medium:
Base medium: Nutristem XF
Main protein source: Serum concentration: % |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | No |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | Flow Cytometry | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| POU5F1 (OCT-4) |
Yes |
|||||
| TRA 1-60 |
Yes |
Morphology pictures
Phase contrast image of iPSC clone
Differentiation Potency
In vivo teratoma
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
Morphology
In vivo teratoma
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
In vivo teratoma
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.