iSMA40
ICGi005-A
General#
Cell Line |
|
| hPSCreg Name | ICGi005-A |
| Alternative name(s) |
iSMA40
|
| Cell line type | Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) |
| Last update | 3rd March 2020 |
| User feedback | |
Provider |
|
| Generator | The Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICG) |
| Owner | The Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICG) |
| Distributors | |
| Derivation country | Russia |
External Databases |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA5100024 |
| Cellosaurus | CVCL_UF65 |
| CLO | CLO_0102317 |
General Information |
|
| Publications | |
| * Is the cell line readily obtainable for third parties? |
Yes Research: allowed
Clinical: not allowed
Commercial: not allowed
|
Donor Information#
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | female |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | A disease was diagnosed.
|
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
Unknown
|
Other Genotyping (Donor) |
|
| Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
No
|
Donor Relations |
|
| Other cell lines of this donor | |
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA5131662 |
Ethics#
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | Yes |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | Yes |
| If you do not hold the SIGNED Donor Consent Form, have you obtained a copy of the unsigned Donor Consent Form from the holder? | No |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | pseudonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | Controlled Access |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | the D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology ethics committee |
| Approval number | 65/2014 |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | the D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology ethics committee |
| Approval number | 65/2014 |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? |
hIPSC Derivation#
General |
|
| Source cell line name |
f1SMA Derived from same source line (potentially other lot and donor, see below):
|
| Source cell type |
fibroblastA connective tissue cell which secretes an extracellular matrix rich in collagen and other macromolecules. Flattened and irregular in outline with branching processes; appear fusiform or spindle-shaped.
|
| Source cell origin |
fibroblast of dermis |
| Collected in | 2014 |
| Passage number reprogrammed | 6 |
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Episomal |
| Genes | |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
PCR
|
| Files and images showing reprogramming vector expressed or silenced | |
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Selection criteria for clones | ES-like morphology |
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
No |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions#
| Surface coating | Gelatin | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Feeder cells |
mouse embryonic fibroblasts Cellfinder Ont Id: EFO_0004040 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Passage method |
Enzymatically
TrypLE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 Concentration | 5 % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Medium |
Other medium:
Base medium: KO-DMEM
Main protein source: Knock-out serum replacement Serum concentration: 15 % Supplements
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | Yes |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | Yes |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation#
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | FACS | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| POU5F1 (OCT-4) |
Yes |
|||||
| NANOG |
Yes |
|||||
| SOX2 |
Yes |
|
||||
| SSEA-4 |
Yes |
|||||
| TRA 1-81 |
Yes |
Score:
| Marker | Present | Absent |
| mCpG | ||
| OCT4 |
Morphology pictures
iSMA40.tif
Scale bar 500 µm
Differentiation Potency
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
| Marker | Expressed |
| CK18 |
Yes |
Morphology
isma_40_diff_KRT18_scale.tif
Scale bare 100 µm
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
| Marker | Expressed |
| ACTA2 |
Yes |
Morphology
isma_40_diff_a-sma_r_1_scale.tif
Scale bar 100 µm
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
| Marker | Expressed |
| TUBB3 |
Yes |
Morphology
isma_40_diff_bIII_200g-2_scale.tif
Scale bar 100 µm
Microbiology / Virus Screening |
|
| Mycoplasma | Negative |
Genotyping#
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.