BBANTWi009-A
General
Cell Line |
|
hPSCreg name | BBANTWi009-A |
Cite as: | BBANTWi009-A (RRID:CVCL_C0C7) |
Cell line type | Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) |
Similar lines |
|
Last update | 4th January 2023 |
User feedback | |
Provider |
|
Generator | Biobank Antwerpen (BBANTW) |
Owner | Center of Medical Genetics Antwerp (CMGANT) |
Distributors | |
Derivation country | Belgium |
External Databases |
|
BioSamples | SAMEA14207933 |
Cellosaurus | CVCL_C0C7 |
Wikidata | Q112929275 |
General Information |
|
Publications | |
* Is the cell line readily obtainable for third parties? |
Yes Research use: allowed
Clinical use: not allowed
Commercial use: not allowed
|
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
Sex | male |
Ethnicity | Caucasian |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
Diseases | A disease was diagnosed.
|
Disease associated phenotypes |
|
Family history | Yes |
Is the medical history available upon request? | Available upon request |
Is clinical information available? | Available upon request |
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
46, XY. No clinically significant abnormalities observed.
Karyotyping method:
Molecular karyotyping by SNP array
http:// |
Other Genotyping (Donor) |
|
Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
Yes
SNP typing array
Skin fibroblast DNA sample was genotyped with Illumina's HumanCytoSNP-12 v2.1. No clinically significant CNVs observed, except for the disease causing BGN mutation.. |
External Databases (Donor) |
|
BioSamples | SAMEA14208064 |
Ethics
Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | Yes |
Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | Yes |
Confirm that consent was obtained by a qualified professional | Yes |
Has the donor been informed about how her/his data will be protected? | Yes |
Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | pseudonymised |
Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
Does consent pertain to a specific research project? | Yes |
Details on restriction to research project | Study of Meester-Loeys syndrome |
Does the consent permit uses of donated embryo/tissue or derived cell line intended for clinical treatment or human applications? | No |
Does consent expressly prevent development of commercial products? | No |
Does consent expressly prevent financial gain from any use of the donated embryo/tissue, including any product made from it? | No |
Does consent prevent the DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
Does consent permit research by | |
an academic institution? | Yes |
Does consent expressly permit collection of genetic information? | Yes |
Does consent expressly permit storage of genetic information? | Yes |
Does consent prevent dissemination of genetic information? | No |
Has the donor been informed that their donated biosample or derived cells may be tested for the presence of microbiological agents / pathogens? | No |
Has the donor consented to receive information discovered during use of donated embryo/tissue that has significant health implications for the donor? | Yes |
How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | Controlled Access |
Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
Does the consent anticipate that the donor will be notified of results or outcomes of any research involving the donated samples or derived cells? | Yes |
Does the consent permit the donor, upon withdrawal of consent, to stop the use of the derived cell line(s) that have already been created from donated samples? | Yes |
Does the consent permit the donor, upon withdrawal of consent, to stop delivery or use of information and data about the donor? | Yes |
Does consent permit access to medical records of the donor? | Yes |
Please describe how access is provided: | Through the treating physician |
Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
Name of accrediting authority involved? | Commissie voor medische ethiek UZA |
Approval number | 11/8/79 |
Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | Yes |
Name of accrediting authority involved? | Commissie voor medische ethiek UZA |
Approval number | 11/8/79 |
Is there an MTA available for the cell line? | No |
For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? | CytoTune™-iPS 2.0 Sendai Reprogramming Kit from Invitrogen / ThermoFisher Scientific |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
Source cell type | |
Reprogramming method |
|
Vector type | Non-integrating |
Vector | Sendai virus |
Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
Methods used |
RT-PCR
|
Notes on reprogramming vector detection | SeV not detected on passage 10 |
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
Selection criteria for clones | Clones were picked based on morphology (round, flat colonies with smooth edges and tightly packed cells) for 5 rounds and subsequently passaged using EDTA for 5 more rounds. Only clones with nice morphology and no differentiation after these 10 passaging rounds were selected. |
Derived under xeno-free conditions |
No |
Derived under GMP? |
Unknown |
Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
Feeder cells |
No |
Passage method |
Enzyme-free cell dissociation
EDTA
|
O2 Concentration | 5 % |
CO2 Concentration | 5 % |
Medium |
Essential 8™ Flex
|
Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | No |
Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | Flow Cytometry | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
TRA 1-60 |
Yes |
|||||
TRA 1-81 |
Yes |
|||||
NANOG |
Yes |
|||||
POU5F1 (OCT-4) |
Yes |
|||||
SOX2 |
Yes |
Differentiation Potency
In vitro directed differentiation
Marker | Expressed |
CXCR4 |
Yes |
SOX17 |
Yes |
In vitro directed differentiation
Microbiology / Virus Screening |
|
Mycoplasma | Negative |
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
46, XY. No clinically significant abnormalities observed.
Passage number: 10
Karyotyping method:
Molecular karyotyping by SNP array
http:// |
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
Yes
SNP typing array
Genotyped with Illumina's HumanCytoSNP-12 v2.1. No clinically significant CNVs observed, except for the disease causing mutation.. |
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.