1020ips3
LEIi019-A
General
Cell Line |
|
| hPSCreg name | LEIi019-A |
| Cite as: | LEIi019-A (RRID:CVCL_C1UC) |
| Alternative name(s) |
1020ips3
|
| Cell line type | Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) |
| Similar lines | No similar lines found. |
| Last update | 19th May 2024 |
| User feedback | |
Provider |
|
| Generator | Lions Eye Institute (LEI) |
| Owner | Lions Eye Institute (LEI) |
| Distributors | |
| Derivation country | Australia |
External Databases |
|
| Cellosaurus | CVCL_C1UC |
| Wikidata | Q114311875 |
| BioSamples | SAMEA115605856 |
General Information |
|
| Publications | |
| * Is the cell line readily obtainable for third parties? |
Yes Research use: allowed
Clinical use: not allowed
Commercial use: not allowed
|
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | male |
| Age of donor (at collection) | 15-19 |
| Ethnicity | Indian |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | A disease was diagnosed.
|
| Is the medical history available upon request? | Yes |
| Is clinical information available? | Yes |
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
No
|
Other Genotyping (Donor) |
|
| Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
No
|
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA115605858 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | Yes |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | Yes |
| Is there other documentation provided to the donor for consenting purposes? | No |
| Confirm that consent was obtained by a qualified professional | Yes |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | pseudonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
| Does consent pertain to a specific research project? | No |
| Does consent permit unforeseen future research, without further consent? | Yes |
| Does the consent permit uses of donated embryo/tissue or derived cell line intended for clinical treatment or human applications? | No |
| Does consent expressly permit storage of donated embryo/tissue for an unlimited time? | No |
| Does consent expressly permit storage of cells derived from the donated embryo/tissue for an unlimited time? | No |
| Does consent prevent the DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| Does consent expressly permit collection of genetic information? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly permit storage of genetic information? | Yes |
| Does consent prevent dissemination of genetic information? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | Controlled Access |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Does the consent permit the donor, upon withdrawal of consent, to stop the use of the derived cell line(s) that have already been created from donated samples? | Yes |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | The University of Western Australia |
| Approval number | RA/4/1/7916 |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | The University of Western Australia |
| Approval number | RA/4/1/7916 |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type |
Dermal fibroblasts are the major cell type in dermis and are commonly accepted as terminally differentiated cells.
|
| Source cell origin | |
| Age of donor (at collection) | 15-19 |
| Collected in | 2016 |
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Episomal |
| Genes | |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
PCR
|
| Files and images showing reprogramming vector expressed or silenced | |
Vector free reprogramming |
|
| Type of used vector free reprogramming factor(s) |
None
|
Other |
|
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
Yes |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method |
Enzyme-free cell dissociation
EDTA
|
| O2 Concentration | 21 % |
| CO2 Concentration | 5 % |
| Medium |
TeSR™ E8™
|
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | Flow Cytometry | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| POU5F1 (OCT-4) |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| NANOG |
Yes |
|
Differentiation Potency
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
In vitro spontaneous differentiation
Microbiology / Virus Screening |
|
| Mycoplasma | Negative |
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.