MS19-ES-H
The cell line is not validated yet.
NHLBIi001-B
General
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | female |
| Ethnicity | Caucasian |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | No disease was diagnosed.
|
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
46,XX
Karyotyping method:
G-Banding
|
Other Genotyping (Donor) |
|
| Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
No
|
Donor Relations |
|
| Other cell lines of this donor | |
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA6348714 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | Yes |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | No |
| If you do not hold the Donor Consent Form, do you know who does? | Yes |
| Please provide the contact information | https://clinicalstudies.info.nih.gov/VisitProtocol.aspx?ID=10-H-0126 |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | pseudonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | Open Access |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | NHLBI |
| Approval number | 10-H-0126 |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | NHLBI |
| Approval number | 10-H-0126 |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type |
A peripheral blood cell with a single nucleus. This category includes lymphocytes and monocytes.
Synonyms
|
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Sendai virus |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
RT-PCR
|
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Selection criteria for clones | iPSC clones with hESC-like morphology were picked |
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
Yes |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method |
Enzyme-free cell dissociation
EDTA
|
| O2 Concentration | 21 % |
| CO2 Concentration | 5 % |
| Medium |
Essential 8™
|
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | Yes |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | Flow Cytometry | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| SSEA-4 |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| NANOG |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| TRA 1-60 |
Yes |
|
||||
| POU5F1 (OCT-4) |
Yes |
|
||||
| SOX2 |
Yes |
|
Morphology pictures
Differentiation Potency
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
46,XX
Karyotyping method:
G-Banding
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.