F324 19.7
UNEWi025-C
General
Cell Line |
|
| hPSCreg name | UNEWi025-C |
| Cite as: | UNEWi025-C (RRID:CVCL_IT96) |
| Alternative name(s) |
F324 19.7
|
| Cell line type | Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) |
| Similar lines |
|
| Last update | 18th October 2019 |
| User feedback | |
Provider |
|
| Generator |
University of Newcastle (UNEW)
Contact:
Institute of Genetic Medicine |
| Owner | Institute of Genetic Medicine |
| Distributors | |
| Derivation country | United Kingdom |
External Databases |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA4447909 |
| Cellosaurus | CVCL_IT96 |
| Wikidata | Q54991225 |
General Information |
|
| Projects | |
| * Is the cell line readily obtainable for third parties? |
Yes Research use: allowed
Clinical use: allowed
Commercial use: allowed
|
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | female |
| Age of donor (at collection) | 70-74 |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | No disease was diagnosed.
|
Donor Relations |
|
| Other cell lines of this donor | |
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA4447906 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | No |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | No |
| Please provide contact information of the holder of the original Donor Information Sheet. | Dr David Steel |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | Yes |
| Is there other documentation provided to the donor for consenting purposes? | No |
| Confirm that consent was obtained by a qualified professional | Yes |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | pseudonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
| Does consent pertain to a specific research project? | Yes |
| Details on restriction to research project | Research use restricted to Retinal Degeneration and Dystrophies |
| Does consent permit unforeseen future research, without further consent? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly prevent development of commercial products? | No |
| Does consent expressly prevent financial gain from any use of the donated embryo/tissue, including any product made from it? | No |
| Does consent prevent the DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
Does consent permit research by | |
| an academic institution? | Yes |
| a public organisation? | Yes |
| a non-profit company? | Yes |
| a for-profit corporation? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that their donated biosample or derived cells may be tested for the presence of microbiological agents / pathogens? | Yes |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | Controlled Access |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | Yes |
| Does the consent permit the donor, upon withdrawal of consent, to stop the use of the derived cell line(s) that have already been created from donated samples? | No |
| Does the consent permit the donor, upon withdrawal of consent, to stop delivery or use of information and data about the donor? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee |
| Approval number | 11/NE/0294 |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee |
| Approval number | 11/NE/0294 |
| Do you have obligations to third parties in regard to the use of the cell line? | No |
| Are you aware of any further constraints on the use of the donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | No |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? | |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type |
Any skin fibroblast that is part of some dermis.
|
| Source cell origin |
Any portion of the organ that covers that body and consists of a layer of epidermis and a layer of dermis.
Synonyms
|
| Age of donor (at collection) | 70-74 |
| Passage number reprogrammed | P4 |
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Sendai virus |
| Genes | |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
PCR
|
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Selection criteria for clones | Based on morphology, growth rate and expression of SSEA4 and NANOG |
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
No |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method |
Enzyme-free cell dissociation
EDTA
|
| O2 Concentration | 20 % |
| CO2 Concentration | 5 % |
| Medium |
mTeSR™ 1
|
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | Flow Cytometry | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| NANOG |
Yes |
|
||||
| SSEA-4 |
Yes |
|
||||
| TRA 1-60 |
Yes |
|
||||
| SSEA-1 |
No |
|
Differentiation Potency
Microbiology / Virus Screening |
|
| HIV 1 | Negative |
| HIV 2 | Negative |
| Hepatitis B | Negative |
| Hepatitis C | Negative |
| Mycoplasma | Negative |
Certificate of Analysis |
|
| Is there a certificate of analysis available? |
Yes
Passage:
12
|
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
No clinically significant imbalance was detected
Passage number: P12
Karyotyping method:
Molecular karyotyping by SNP array
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.