P71 iPSCs 1
IBPi002-A
General#
Donor Information#
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | male |
| Age of donor (at collection) | 65-69 |
| Ethnicity | Caucasian |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | A disease was diagnosed.
|
| Is the medical history available upon request? | yes |
| Is clinical information available? | yes |
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
No
|
Other Genotyping (Donor) |
|
| Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
No
|
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA4892803 |
Ethics#
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | Yes |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed about how her/his data will be protected? | Yes |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | anonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
| Does consent expressly prevent development of commercial products? | No |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | Controlled Access |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | ethics committee of Palacky University, Olomouc; Czech Republic approval nr. 127/14 and 163/08 |
| Approval number | 127/14, 163/08 |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | ethics committee of Palacky University, Olomouc; Czech Republic approval nr. 127/14 and 163/08 |
| Approval number | 127/14, 163/08 |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? |
hIPSC Derivation#
General |
|
| Source cell line name | prostate cancer associated fibroblasts P71 |
| Source cell type |
fibroblastA connective tissue cell which secretes an extracellular matrix rich in collagen and other macromolecules. Flattened and irregular in outline with branching processes; appear fusiform or spindle-shaped.; 分泌富含胶原和其他大分子的细胞外基质的结缔组织细胞。有分支过程的轮廓扁平，不规则；呈梭形或纺锤形。
|
| Source cell origin |
prostate adenocarcinomaA carcinoma that arises from glandular epithelial cells of the prostate gland; An adenocarcinoma arising from the prostate gland. It is one of the most common malignant tumors afflicting men. The majority of adenocarcinomas arise in the peripheral zone and a minority occurs in the central or the transitional zone of the prostate gland. Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma predicts disease progression and correlates with survival. Several grading systems have been proposed, of which the Gleason system is the most commonly used. Gleason sums of 2 to 4 represent well-differentiated disease, 5 to 7 moderately differentiated disease and 8 to 10 poorly differentiated disease. Prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) serum test is widely used as a screening test for the early detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Treatment options include radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, androgen ablation and cryotherapy. Watchful waiting or surveillance alone is an option for older patients with low-grade or low-stage disease.; Tumors or cancer of the PROSTATE.
Synonyms
|
| Source cell type (free text) | prostate cancer-associated fibroblasts |
| Age of donor (at collection) | 65-69 |
| Collected in | 2011 |
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Episomal |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
PCR
|
| Files and images showing reprogramming vector expressed or silenced | |
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Selection criteria for clones | morphology |
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
No |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions#
| Surface coating | Vitronectin |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method |
Enzyme-free cell dissociation
EDTA
|
| CO2 Concentration | 5 % |
| Medium |
Essential 8™
|
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation#
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | FACS | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| NANOG |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| SOX2 |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| POU5F1 (OCT-4) |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| TRA 1-60 |
Yes |
|
Differentiation Potency
Genotyping#
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
45,X
Passage number: 36
Karyotyping method:
G-Banding
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.