SCZ 3.5

General#

Cell Line

hPSCreg Name VUi011-A
Alternative name(s)
SCZ 3.5
Cell line type Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)
Last update 20th November 2020
User feedback
No feedback available yet.

Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.

Provider

Generator Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU)

External Databases

Cellosaurus CVCL_ZB12
BioSamples SAMEA7762116
CLO CLO_0103084

General Information

* Is the cell line readily obtainable for third parties?
No

Donor Information#

General Donor Information

Sex male

Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor)

Diseases A disease was diagnosed.
Schizophrenia
Synonyms
  • Schizophrenia
  • schizophrenia

External Databases (Donor)

BioSamples SAMEA7762117

Ethics#

Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? Yes
Was the consent voluntarily given? Yes
Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? Yes
Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? Yes
Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold a copy of the SIGNED Donor Consent Form? Yes
If you do not hold the SIGNED Donor Consent Form, have you obtained a copy of the unsigned Donor Consent Form from the holder? No
Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. pseudonymised
Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? Yes
Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? Yes
How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? Controlled Access
Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? No
Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? Yes
Name of accrediting authority involved? Regional ethics board in Stockholm
Approval number 2011-324-31 and 2012/214-32
Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? Yes
Name of accrediting authority involved? Regional ethics board in Stockholm
Approval number 2011-324-31 and 2012/214-32
For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used?

hIPSC Derivation#

General

Source cell type
Fibroblast
Synonyms
  • fibroblast
  • Fibroblasts
  • Fibroblast

Reprogramming method

Vector type Non-integrating
Vector Episomal

Vector free reprogramming

Other

Derived under xeno-free conditions
Unknown
Derived under GMP?
Unknown
Available as clinical grade?
Unknown

Culture Conditions#

Medium TeSR™ E8™

Characterisation#

Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
Marker Expressed Immunostaining RT-PCR FACS Enzymatic Assay Expression Profiles
SOX2
Yes
POU5F1 (OCT-4)
Yes
Pluripotency Score Novelty Score
25,29 1,67
Morphology pictures

Genotyping#

Karyotyping (Cell Line)

Has the cell line karyotype been analysed?
No

Other Genotyping (Cell Line)