hiPSC NP0039
HDZi001-A
General
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | male |
| Ethnicity | European |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | A disease was diagnosed.
|
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
Karyotyping method:
Array CGH
|
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA7001543 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | No |
| Please provide contact information of the holder of the original Donor Information Sheet. | Torsten Bloch Rasmussen, MD; Aarhus Universiteshospital, Skejby, Hjertemedicinsk Afdeling B, Brendstrupgardsvej 100, 8200 Aarhus N |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | No |
| If you do not hold the Donor Consent Form, do you know who does? | Yes |
| Please provide the contact information | Torsten Bloch Rasmussen, MD; Aarhus Universiteshospital, Skejby, Hjertemedicinsk Afdeling B, Brendstrupgardsvej 100, 8200 Aarhus N |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | pseudonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | No information |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | Ethic committee of the Ruhr university Bochum in Bad Oeynhausen |
| Approval number | 41/2008 |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | Ethic committee of the Ruhr university Bochum in Bad Oeynhausen |
| Approval number | 41/2008 |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type |
Dermal fibroblasts are the major cell type in dermis and are commonly accepted as terminally differentiated cells.
|
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Sendai virus |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
Yes |
| Methods used |
RT-PCR
|
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
Unknown |
| Derived under GMP? |
Unknown |
| Available as clinical grade? |
Unknown |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method |
Enzymatically
Collagenase
|
| Medium |
Other medium:
Base medium: StemMACS™ iPS-Brew XF
Main protein source: Serum concentration: % |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | Yes |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
Score:
| Marker | Present | Absent |
| mCpG | ||
| OCT4 |
Morphology pictures
Differentiation Potency
Microbiology / Virus Screening |
|
| Mycoplasma | Negative |
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.