The cell line is not validated yet.
ICMi001-A
General
Cell Line |
|
| hPSCreg name | ICMi001-A |
| Cite as: | ICMi001-A |
| Cell line type | Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) |
| Similar lines | No similar lines found. |
| Last update | 5th December 2025 |
| User feedback | |
Provider |
|
| Generator |
Institut du Cerveau (ICM) (ICM)
Contact:
Institut du Cerveau (ICM) (ICM) |
| Owner | Institut du Cerveau (ICM) (ICM) |
| Distributors | |
| Derivation country | France |
External Databases |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA120478371 |
General Information |
|
| * Is the cell line readily obtainable for third parties? |
Yes Cell line can only be used in: Down syndrome
Research use: allowed
Clinical use: not allowed
Commercial use: not allowed
Additional restrictions:
Through BIOJEL request |
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | male |
| Ethnicity | Caucasian |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | A disease was diagnosed.
|
| Is the medical history available upon request? | YES |
| Is clinical information available? | YES |
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
47,XY,+21
Karyotyping method:
Molecular karyotyping by SNP array
|
Other Genotyping (Donor) |
|
| Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
No
|
Donor Relations |
|
| Other cell lines of this donor | |
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA120478835 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | No |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | No |
| If you do not hold the Donor Consent Form, do you know who does? | Yes |
| Alternatives to consent are available? | No |
| Is there other documentation provided to the donor for consenting purposes? | No |
| Confirm that consent was obtained by a qualified professional | Yes |
| Has the donor agreed to be re-contacted? | Unknown |
| Has the donor been informed about how her/his data will be protected? | Yes |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | anonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| * Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| * Does consent pertain to a specific research project? | No |
| Does consent permit unforeseen future research, without further consent? | Yes |
| Does the consent permit uses of donated embryo/tissue or derived cell line intended for clinical treatment or human applications? | No |
| Does consent expressly prevent development of commercial products? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly prevent financial gain from any use of the donated embryo/tissue, including any product made from it? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly permit storage of donated embryo/tissue for an unlimited time? | No |
| Does consent expressly permit storage of cells derived from the donated embryo/tissue for an unlimited time? | Yes |
| Does consent prevent the DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | Yes |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
Does consent permit research by | |
| an academic institution? | Yes |
| a public organisation? | Yes |
| a non-profit company? | Yes |
| a for-profit corporation? | No |
| Does consent expressly permit collection of genetic information? | No |
| Does consent expressly permit storage of genetic information? | No |
| Does consent prevent dissemination of genetic information? | No |
| Has the donor been informed that their donated biosample or derived cells may be tested for the presence of microbiological agents / pathogens? | No |
| Has the donor consented to receive information discovered during use of donated embryo/tissue that has significant health implications for the donor? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | No information |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Does the consent anticipate that the donor will be notified of results or outcomes of any research involving the donated samples or derived cells? | No |
| Does the consent permit the donor, upon withdrawal of consent, to stop the use of the derived cell line(s) that have already been created from donated samples? | No |
| Does the consent permit the donor, upon withdrawal of consent, to stop delivery or use of information and data about the donor? | No |
| Does consent permit access to medical records of the donor? | No |
| Does consent permit access to any other source of information about the clinical treatment or health of the donor? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | No |
| Do you have obligations to third parties in regard to the use of the cell line? | No |
| Are you aware of any further constraints on the use of the donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | No |
| Is there an MTA available for the cell line? | No |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Are you aware of any constraints on the use or distribution of the cell line from the owner or any parties identified in the query above? | No |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type |
A peripheral blood cell with a single nucleus. This category includes lymphocytes and monocytes.
Synonyms
|
| Source cell origin |
A liquid tissue; its major function is to transport oxygen throughout the body. It also supplies the tissues with nutrients, removes waste products, and contains various components of the immune system defending the body against infection. Several hormones also travel in the blood.
Synonyms
|
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Sendai virus |
| Genes | |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
PCR, RT-PCR, Sequencing
|
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Selection criteria for clones | Immunofluorescence (IF) analysis confirmed absence of residual Sendai virus proteins and pluripotency with robust expression of NANOG, TRA-1-60, and SSEA4. Trilineage differentiation potential was validated by differentiating into embryoid bodies (EBs) and assessing ectodermal (TUJ1), mesodermal (SMA), and endodermal (β-Catenin) marker expression. Clear upregulation of all three germ layer markers relative to parental iPSCs confirmed the capacity of the clone for spontaneous trilineage differentiation. TaqMan® hPSC Scorecard analysis (ThermoFisher, performed externally) was conducted and their derived embryoid bodies (EBs) to quantitatively assess pluripotency and differentiation capacity. Pluripotency was confirmed by robust expression of core pluripotency genes at levels comparable to established iPSC and ESC standards (n = 13 lines). Differentiation potential was validated by the overexpression of lineage-specific genes in EBs corresponding to all three embryonic germ layers relative to their expression in the parental iPSCs, demonstrating faithful trilineage differentiation. Genomic integrity was assessed by high-density SNP genotyping (Illumina). |
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
Unknown |
| Derived under GMP? |
Unknown |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method | Mechanically |
| Medium |
mTeSR™ Plus
|
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | Yes |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | Unknown |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | Flow Cytometry | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| NANOG |
Yes |
|
||||
| SSEA-4 |
Yes |
|
||||
| TRA 1-60 |
Yes |
|
Score:
| Marker | Present | Absent |
| mCpG | ||
| OCT4 |
Self-renewal
Positive
Endoderm
Positive
Mesoderm
Positive
Ectoderm score
Positive
Differentiation Potency
Microbiology / Virus Screening |
|
| Mycoplasma | Negative |
Certificate of Analysis |
|
| Is there a certificate of analysis available? |
Yes
Passage:
|
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.