SiPS3.6
MUSIi012-A
General
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | female |
| Ethnicity | Thai |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | No disease was diagnosed.
|
Other Genotyping (Donor) |
|
| Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
No
|
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA6013991 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | Yes |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | No |
| If you do not hold the Donor Consent Form, do you know who does? | Yes |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | anonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| * Does consent expressly prevent the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | No |
| * Does consent pertain to a specific research project? | No |
| Does consent permit unforeseen future research, without further consent? | Yes |
| Does the consent permit uses of donated embryo/tissue or derived cell line intended for clinical treatment or human applications? | No |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | No information |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SiRB) |
| Approval number | COA no. Si248/2011) |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell type | |
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Episomal |
| Genes | |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
PCR
|
Vector free reprogramming |
|
Other |
|
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
Unknown |
| Derived under GMP? |
Unknown |
| Available as clinical grade? |
Unknown |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Medium |
Other medium:
Base medium: NutriStem (Corning)
Main protein source: Knock-out serum replacement Serum concentration: % |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | Flow Cytometry | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| POU5F1 (OCT-4) |
Yes |
|||||
| NANOG |
Yes |
|||||
| SOX2 |
Yes |
|||||
| TRA 1-60 |
Yes |
Morphology pictures
MUSIi012-A.pdf
Figure B-E
In vitro differentiation and Teratoma formation
Method documentation
MUSIi012-A.pdf
Figure G and H
Differentiation Potency
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.