wtc11, Wtc11, WTC, WTC11, GM25256
UCSFi001-A
General
Donor Information
General Donor Information |
|
| Sex | male |
| Age of donor (at collection) | 30-34 |
| Ethnicity | Asian |
Phenotype and Disease related information (Donor) |
|
| Diseases | No disease was diagnosed.
|
| Disease associated phenotypes | no phenotypes |
| Family history | N/A |
| Is the medical history available upon request? | No |
| Is clinical information available? | Limited clinical information - EKG |
Karyotyping (Donor) |
|
| Has the donor karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
XY normal
Karyotyping method:
G-Banding
|
Other Genotyping (Donor) |
|
| Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
No
|
Donor Relations |
|
| Other cell lines of this donor | |
External Databases (Donor) |
|
| BioSamples | SAMEA5843920 |
Ethics
| Has informed consent been obtained from the donor of the embryo/tissue from which the pluripotent stem cells have been derived? | Yes |
| Was the consent voluntarily given? | Yes |
| Has the donor been informed that participation will not directly influence their personal treatment? | Yes |
| Can you provide us with a copy of the Donor Information Sheet provided to the donor? | No |
| Do you (Depositor/Provider) hold the original Donor Consent Form? | No |
| If you do not hold the Donor Consent Form, do you know who does? | Yes |
| Alternatives to consent are available? | No |
| Is there other documentation provided to the donor for consenting purposes? | No |
| Confirm that consent was obtained by a qualified professional | Yes |
| Has the donor agreed to be re-contacted? | Unknown |
| Has the donor been informed about how her/his data will be protected? | Yes |
| Please indicate whether the data associated with the donated material has been pseudonymised or anonymised. | anonymised |
| Does consent explicitly allow the derivation of pluripotent stem cells? | Yes |
| * Does consent pertain to a specific research project? | No |
| Does consent permit unforeseen future research, without further consent? | Yes |
| Does the consent permit uses of donated embryo/tissue or derived cell line intended for clinical treatment or human applications? | No |
| Does consent expressly prevent development of commercial products? | No |
| Does consent expressly prevent financial gain from any use of the donated embryo/tissue, including any product made from it? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly permit storage of donated embryo/tissue for an unlimited time? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly permit storage of cells derived from the donated embryo/tissue for an unlimited time? | Yes |
| Does consent prevent the DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
| Does consent prevent CELLS DERIVED FROM THE DONATED BIOSAMPLE from being made available to researchers anywhere in the world? | No |
Does consent permit research by | |
| an academic institution? | Yes |
| a public organisation? | Yes |
| a non-profit company? | Yes |
| a for-profit corporation? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly permit collection of genetic information? | Yes |
| Does consent expressly permit storage of genetic information? | Yes |
| Does consent prevent dissemination of genetic information? | No |
| Has the donor been informed that their donated biosample or derived cells may be tested for the presence of microbiological agents / pathogens? | Yes |
| Has the donor consented to receive information discovered during use of donated embryo/tissue that has significant health implications for the donor? | Yes |
| How may genetic information associated with the cell line be accessed? | Open Access |
| Will the donor expect to receive financial benefit, beyond reasonable expenses, in return for donating the biosample? | No |
| Does the consent anticipate that the donor will be notified of results or outcomes of any research involving the donated samples or derived cells? | No |
| Does consent permit access to any other source of information about the clinical treatment or health of the donor? | No |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the Research Protocol including the consent provisions? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | University of California San Francisco |
| Approval number | 10-02521 |
| Has a favourable opinion been obtained from a research ethics committee, or other ethics review panel, in relation to the PROPOSED PROJECT, involving use of donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | Yes |
| Name of accrediting authority involved? | University of California San Francisco |
| Approval number | 10-02521 |
| Do you have obligations to third parties in regard to the use of the cell line? | No |
| Are you aware of any further constraints on the use of the donated embryo/tissue or derived cells? | No |
| Is there an MTA available for the cell line? | Yes |
| For generation of the cell line, who was the supplier of any recombined DNA vectors or commercial kits used? | Addgene for Dr. Shinya Yamanaka, CiRA, Japan (episomal plasmids) |
| Are you aware of any constraints on the use or distribution of the cell line from the owner or any parties identified in the query above? | No |
hIPSC Derivation
General |
|
| Source cell line name |
UCSFi001-A Derived from same source line (potentially other lot and donor, see below):
|
| Source cell type |
Synonyms
|
| Source cell origin |
A zone of skin that is part of a lower leg [Automatically generated definition].
Synonyms
|
| Source cell type (free text) | fibroblasts from skin biopsy of the calf. |
| Source cell line lot number |
None
|
| Age of donor (at collection) | 30-34 |
| Collected in | 2011 |
| Source cell line vendor | none |
| Passage number reprogrammed | 2 |
Reprogramming method |
|
| Vector type | Non-integrating |
| Vector | Episomal |
| Genes | |
| Is reprogramming vector detectable? |
No |
| Methods used |
PCR
|
| Notes on reprogramming vector detection | No vector detected |
Vector free reprogramming |
|
| Type of used vector free reprogramming factor(s) |
None
|
Other |
|
| Selection criteria for clones | Clones were picked on standard iPSC morphology (i.e. whether they had tightly packed cells in colonies with tight, non-differentiated boundaries), karyotypic stability, expression of pluirpotency markers OCT3/4, SOX2, NANOG, SSEA4, TRA-1-60, and loss of reprogramming vectors. |
| Derived under xeno-free conditions |
No |
| Derived under GMP? |
No |
| Available as clinical grade? |
No |
Culture Conditions
| Surface coating | Matrigel/Geltrex |
| Feeder cells |
No |
| Passage method | both enzyme or enzyme-free depending on user |
| CO2 Concentration | 5 % |
| Medium |
mTeSR™ 1
|
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at passage previously with this cell line? | Yes |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at cryo previously with this cell line? | No |
| Has Rock inhibitor (Y27632) been used at thaw previously with this cell line? | Yes |
Characterisation
Analysis of Undifferentiated Cells
| Marker | Expressed | Immunostaining | RT-PCR | Flow Cytometry | Enzymatic Assay | Expression Profiles |
| POU5F1 (OCT-4) |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| SOX2 |
Yes |
|
|
|||
| NANOG |
Yes |
|
|
Transcriptome Characterisation
Differentiation Potency
Genotyping
Karyotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Has the cell line karyotype been analysed? |
Yes
|
Other Genotyping (Cell Line) |
|
| Is there genome-wide genotyping or functional data available? |
Yes
|
Login to share your feedback, experiences or results with the research community.